Ask Madhukar - Techbytes

The following image displays the most common architectural styles for APIs. 🔹 1. REST REST, which was proposed in 2000, is the most widely used style for APIs. It is often utilized between front-end clients and back-end services, and it adheres to six architectural constraints. The payload format may be JSON, XML, HTML, or plain text. 🔹 2. GraphQL Meta proposed GraphQL in 2015. It provides a schema and type system that is ideal for complicated systems where entities' relationships are graph-like. In the diagram below, GraphQL can retrieve user and order information in one call, while REST necessitates multiple calls. GraphQL does not replace REST but can be built upon existing REST services. 🔹 3. Web socket Web socket is a protocol that enables full-duplex communications over TCP. Clients create web sockets to receive real-time updates from back-end services. Unlike REST, which always "pulls" data, web socket allows data to be "pushed". 🔹 4. Webhook Webhook

  Hub Hubs are used to connect multiple devices in a network. They’re less likely to be seen in business or corporate networks than in home networks. Hubs are wired devices and are not as smart as switches or routers. Switches Switches are wired devices that know the addresses of the devices connected to them and route traffic to that port/device rather than retransmitting to all devices. Offering greater efficiency for traffic delivery and improving the overall throughput of data, switches are smarter than hubs but not as smart as routers Router Routers are used to control traffic flow on networks and are often used to connect similar networks and control traffic flow between them. Routers can be wired or wireless and can connect multiple switches. Smarter than hubs and switches, routers determine the most efficient “route” for the traffic to flow across the network. Firewalls Firewalls are essential tools in managing and controlling network traffic and protecting the network. A firew

UX ದೃಷ್ಟಿಕೋನದಿಂದ, ಪೂರ್ವಾಪೇಕ್ಷಿತ ಚೆಕ್‌ಗಳು ಹಲವಾರು ಅಥವಾ ಸಂಕೀರ್ಣವಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ ಅವುಗಳನ್ನು ಬಹು ಪರದೆಗಳಾಗಿ ವಿಭಜಿಸುವುದು ಉತ್ತಮವಾಗಿದೆ, ವಿಶೇಷವಾಗಿ ಅವುಗಳಿಗೆ ಬಳಕೆದಾರರ ಇನ್‌ಪುಟ್ ಅಥವಾ ಪರಸ್ಪರ ಕ್ರಿಯೆಯ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿದ್ದರೆ. ಒಂದೇ ಪರದೆಯ ಮೇಲೆ ಬಹು ಪೂರ್ವಾಪೇಕ್ಷಿತ ತಪಾಸಣೆಗಳನ್ನು ಪ್ರದರ್ಶಿಸಿದಾಗ, ಅದು ಬಳಕೆದಾರರಿಗೆ ಅಗಾಧವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವ ಚೆಕ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಳಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವವುಗಳು ಬಾಕಿ ಉಳಿದಿವೆ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಕಷ್ಟವಾಗಬಹುದು.  ಇದು ಗೊಂದಲ, ಹತಾಶೆ ಮತ್ತು ದೋಷಗಳಿಗೆ ಕಾರಣವಾಗಬಹುದು. ಪೂರ್ವಾಪೇಕ್ಷಿತ ಚೆಕ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ಬಹು ಪರದೆಗಳಾಗಿ ವಿಭಜಿಸುವುದರಿಂದ ಬಳಕೆದಾರರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆಯನ್ನು ಹೆಚ್ಚು ನಿರ್ವಹಿಸಬಹುದಾಗಿದೆ. ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಪರದೆಯು ನಿರ್ದಿಷ್ಟ ಕಾರ್ಯ ಅಥವಾ ಕಾರ್ಯಗಳ ಸೆಟ್‌ನ ಮೇಲೆ ಕೇಂದ್ರೀಕರಿಸಬಹುದು, ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟ ಸೂಚನೆಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಂಡ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಯೊಂದಿಗೆ. ಇದು ಬಳಕೆದಾರರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆಯ ಮೇಲೆ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ನಿಯಂತ್ರಣವನ್ನು ಹೊಂದಲು ಸಹಾಯ ಮಾಡುತ್ತದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಪೂರ್ವಾಪೇಕ್ಷಿತ ಪರಿಶೀಲನೆಗಳ ಒಟ್ಟಾರೆ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆಯಿಂದ ಕಡಿಮೆಯಾಗಿ ಮುಳುಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಆದಾಗ್ಯೂ, ಪೂರ್ವಾಪೇಕ್ಷಿತ ಪರಿಶೀಲನೆಗಳು ಸರಳವಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ ಮತ್ತು ತ್ವರಿತವಾಗಿ ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಳಿಸಬಹುದಾದರೆ, ಅವುಗಳನ್ನು ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟವಾಗಿ ಸಂಘಟಿಸಿದರೆ ಮತ್ತು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಸುಲಭವಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ, ಅವುಗಳನ್ನು ಒಂದೇ ಪರದೆಯಲ್

From a UX perspective, it's generally best to split prerequisite checks into multiple screens if they are numerous or complex, especially if they require user input or interaction. When multiple prerequisite checks are displayed on a single screen, it can be overwhelming for the user, and it may be difficult to understand which checks have been completed and which ones are outstanding. This can lead to confusion, frustration, and errors. Splitting the prerequisite checks into multiple screens can make the process more manageable for the user. Each screen can focus on a specific task or set of tasks, with clear instructions and feedback on completion. This can help the user feel more in control of the process and less overwhelmed by the overall number of prerequisite checks. However, if the prerequisite checks are simple and can be completed quickly, it may be appropriate to display them all on a single screen, provided they are clearly organized and easy to understand. In this case

Netflix has decided to end the practice of password sharing. Previously, they had encouraged sharing passwords with friends and family, but now they require users to confirm that they live in the same household or purchase their own subscription. To confirm that someone outside the household is using the account, the primary account holder will need to verify their device using a 4-digit code. The device will have access for seven days before requiring another verification.  Netflix considers a household as a location where the account owner and others sharing the account live. They will use IP addresses, device IDs, and account activity to confirm if the user belongs to the household. If the account holder is traveling or connected to the home WiFi, they won't need to verify their device, but they need to connect to the home WiFi once every 31 days.  However, if someone outside the household is using the account, they will be asked to verify and failure to do so may result in bein